City Council: District 5
We sent our questionnaire to all filed candidates. Responses marked with a [...] indicate the candidate didn't directly answer yes or no, but may have provided a written explanation. Responses were edited for typos, but not substance.
You can find the full candidate surveys below, or scroll down to see candidate responses side by side for agree/disagree questions.
Candidates for Council District 5
Click on a candidate below to see their full narrative responses.
Question comparisons
Hover or click on a candidate to see an extended response if the candidate provided one.
10. I support removing parking on a street if it would improve safety and increase mobility of people using that street.
I am not oblivious to the current reliance of Baltimore City residents on cars and why. It is the over reliance on automobiles that also contributes to the issue of public safety and in an adverser way. The overreliance on cars creates the need for parking but also reduces foot traffic and overall pedestrian and other community based activity. The result is a less engaged and familiar community.
11. Minimum parking requirements are shown to increase housing costs while limiting potential density and making neighborhoods less walkable. I support following the lead of other cities that have removed minimum parking requirements from new development.
12. Some cities require employers that subsidize parking also offer an option for employees to receive that subsidy as a cash payment. I support a mandate that employers offer parking cash- out so that employees can choose to pocket that money, use it for alternative transportation, or continue using that cash to pay for parking.
I also support employers offering a public transportation option in lieu of the cash payment. Being able to receive a monthly or even annual public transportation access should also be a viable option.
13. Increasing density in areas of opportunity is proven to help individuals escape poverty. I support taller, denser, or larger buildings in areas they are now prohibited by zoning.
I support the IDEA while being incredibly concerned with opportunistic, low quality housing providers. Concerns around density MUST include heightened demands of safe, quality, and affordable housing.
14. Transit oriented development can expand access to areas of opportunity by locating housing and retail along high frequency transit. Current zoning code only identifies these zones along subway and light rail routes. I support expanded Transit Oriented Development zoning to include areas within a quarter mile of high-frequency bus routes.
15. It is now widely accepted that Single Family Residential Zoning was historically created to maintain racial segregation. I support removing Single Family Residential Zoning categories, allowing both single family and multi family residences to be built in all residential zoning areas.
again agree, but also concerned that low quality housing proliferates in areas where density becomes a priority as opposed to an option.
16. I support allowing existing residences to be split into apartments in all zoning categories without having to pass legislation for each conversion, increasing density in neighborhoods that were traditionally single family homes.
17. At 20mph, 90% of pedestrians survive being hit by a car. At 40mph, only 10% survive. I support enforcing a maximum speed limit of 25 mph on arterial streets, and 20 mph on local streets.
18. Allowing turns on red is a contributing factor in increased pedestrian injury and death. I support banning turns on red at all intersections that allow pedestrian crossing.
BUT with the understanding the bike advocates aggressively participate in the traffic relief planning necessary to deal with the resultant traffic which drove right on red legislation originally.
19. Automated Speed and Red Light Enforcement Cameras are widely proven to reduce fatal collisions. I support using these cameras on any street, not just near schools and construction sites.
20. The Automated Speed Enforcement Camera current threshold is 12 miles per hour. I support cameras being able to issue citations for those traveling 5 miles per hour or more over the speed limit.
21. I would invest in automated enforcement cameras that will issue citations to private automobiles for being stopped or parked in bus lanes.
YES!!!
22. Dedicated bus lanes and bus boarding islands are proven to dramatically improve bus reliability and boarding times. I support removing parking or travel lanes to create bus lanes and boarding islands to improve bus performance.
23. The city adopted the Greenway Trails Network plan that will connect existing trails such as Gwynns Falls Trail and Herring Run Trail to create a 35-mile trail loop that connects 80% of Baltimore’s neighborhoods to greenspace and recreational trails. I support the construction of these trail connections, even if it requires using grass medians or taking road space or parking space away from private automobiles.
