Scott Goldman, Candidate for City Council-1st District

In an effort to educate voters, we will be posting responses to our candidate questionnaire. Questionnaires were emailed to each candidate running for City Council, President of City Council, and Mayor. Candidates have until March 4th to submit. We are publishing results in the order they are received.

How frequently do you use a mode of transportation other than your car to navigate the city? Based on your experience, where should the city prioritize resources for transportation?

SC: Like so many people, how much I use my car depends on my job. When I first moved to Baltimore seven years ago, I commuted every day to Washington, D.C., and I rode the #11 Bus to Penn Station and then took the MARC. During that year, I drove my car no more than once a week. (It was great.) But when I began my service in the Army, there were no adequate public transportation solutions for me between my home and the military installations where I was assigned – Fort Detrick and Fort Meade. So I drove every day, about an hour each way. (It was a pain.) Now, as a candidate for City Council, I have enjoyed giving up my car many days again. I walk daily to meetings and campaign activities here in Southeast Baltimore. I am also the primary caregiver for our nine-month-old son two days a week, so I enjoy taking him for a stroll or walk as much as the weather allows. In the long term, the city must prioritize its resources to get more cars off the road. We are a City built for a million people, but even with just 630,000 people now, we endure terrible traffic because we have prioritized driving as our main form of transportation. The roads are simply insufficient for as many cars as we have. The first steps, which I describe more below, are to work with the State to improve the MTA and bus system while making it easier and safer for people to walk and bike in livable neighborhoods.

What role do you believe biking and walking improvements can play in creating a safer, healthier, more livable Baltimore?

SC: One of the things I love most about living in the First District, especially with a young family, is that we walk and stroll everywhere. So as we develop and reform our local and regional transportation system, bikes and pedestrians have to be at the center of making our transportation effective. This City once had nearly a million people in it, and it worked. Can you imagine what it would be like today with a million residents? To create a safer, healthier, more livable Baltimore, I support protected bike lanes on less-trafficked, one-way streets. I support taking away obstacles and fees to people who want to improve bike infrastructure and add bike racks. We need traffic calming measures in our historic neighborhoods and better use of the waterfront to make it more pedestrian friendly. I would also open up parts of the waterfront promenade to bikes and widen it where possible to make it more bike and pedestrian friendly. And it’s not just about bike lanes; we’ve got to also make sure drivers are aware and safe around bikes and pedestrians. I’ve heard from too many bike riders and would-be riders who tell me that they would ride more if there were real traffic enforcement against distracted drivers who are texting or driving recklessly. Not everyone can bike or walk to work and play, but we should make it easier for those who would but are discouraged by the understandable safety and space issues. We can do all this in Southeast and throughout the City without making it impossible for residents to park and drive from their homes.

Often road redesigns that improve the safety for people on bikes or people walking do so in a way that removes priority for single occupant vehicles. This can look like removing lanes for travel or decreasing available street parking. Can you describe how you would manage public expectations during project implementation, and handle any backlash from constituents that don’t share in the City’s vision for complete streets?

SC: Most important is to make sure I communicate the process and that there are no surprises from my office or City agencies. I will not support changes if the residents of the First District have no voice or visibility over decision-making because backlash is so often the consequence of poor communication. I believe that if First District residents, business leaders, and community leaders are included in the discussion, and that planning follows evidence-based analysis of road design, we will be able to redesign our roads with a net-benefit to our City’s future. Where expectations cannot be met, I will use my experience in negotiating alternative solutions as an attorney and an Army officer. It was always my mission help soldiers and commanders “get to Yes” or find a reasonable alternative, and I can bring those skills to advance our District and City.

Recent audits have discovered that the Department of Transportation struggles to measure key performance indicators. The city’s procurement and project management processes have also faced scrutiny. This has led to significant delays of key improvements to bicycle infrastructure in Baltimore. How will you work to improve performance and accountability of city agencies like the Department of Transportation under your leadership?

SC: DOT’s dysfunction is the tip of the iceberg of the larger dysfunction in our City government. To state the obvious, our City deserves better, and getting things done to make our government work for the First District and the City is my first priority. I come at this effort with my experience as an attorney and Army officer. When I deployed to Afghanistan, I built and led a team of more than a dozen advisors who worked across five provinces in Southeast Afghanistan to track and advance the prosecutions of more than 700 cases in Afghan criminal courts. And throughout my Army career, I conducted investigations and oversight over units ranging from a handful of Soldiers to thousands, with financial consequences from the thousands to millions. I will use those skills and experiences to help revive the oversight role of the City Council and make sure the DOT and other departments are held accountable for their spending and quality of service. I’ll use the oversight power I can gather through public hearings, influence I can bring in the press, and direct interaction with agency managers, to reform DOT and other agencies.

The percentage of people choosing to take public transit or ride a bike for transportation is increasing in Baltimore, while the percentage of residents without access to a vehicle is over 30%. How would you rate the city’s current investment in sustainable transportation solutions for its residents, and as a council person what would you do to support increased investment?

SC: Overall, the city’s investment in sustainable transportation solutions is lacking, but the funds we need to make a real dent in our transportation problems and the agencies that control that funding are at the State and Federal levels. As a City, we could spend all the general funds we have on transportation and still not build the modern transportation infrastructure we need. I know in Southeast Baltimore, we need a Plan B to the Red Line and something that deals with the increasing traffic between Harbor East and I-95. Only State and Federal money can address problems at that scale in Southeast and all over the City. Furthermore, we have such a weak picture of what money is available in the budget now without real audits, and there are so many urgent needs. All that said, I think there is transportation revenue we are not yet collecting but could. First, I am advocating rolling traffic impact fees for developers that get reassessed five and ten years after the completion of a development. Right now, we assess these fees only once, and they seem to always be inadequate to meet the costs in traffic and transportation needs.

A recent study by Harvard economists found that the single strongest factor affecting the odds of a child escaping poverty is not the test scores of his or her local schools or the crime in the community; it is the percent of workers in his or her neighborhood who have long commutes. How do you plan to improve transportation options and commute times for our most vulnerable residents?

SC: Many of our most vulnerable residents rely on buses to commute, and so as a member of the City Council, I will be persistent and smart about lobbying the State to make the MTA responsive to the City’s needs. Our State legislators are doing incredible oversight and reform work; and I strongly support Delegate Brooke Lierman’s efforts to transition MTA’s governance toward more regional control, similar to Washington, D.C.’s, WMATA board. Of course, the Governor has the new B-Link proposal; let’s shape it to work for Baltimore. And, simply put, we need to get on the bus ourselves so that we know what riders are demanding. As I mentioned before, when I worked in Washington, D.C., for a year, I rode the bus and MARC back and forth every day. It all worked well for me, but I was a choice rider on a relatively direct route with a monthly pass paid for by my Federal employer. We’ve got to make the MTA as seamless for every rider. And there are so many obvious fixes to the MTA – universal use of the Charm Card or a unified farecard, real-time movement tracking, and eliminating duplicative routes – that this is somewhere the Council can actually exert its influence and advocate for something better.

What other information about your candidacy would you like to share with our members?

SC: I will serve you the First District and City the way I served my soldiers and commanders in the Army: I will put mission first. This is not about politics for me. When a soldier asked me for help or a commander gave me an order, I didn’t worry about who gets the credit or the blame; I just got it done. I found out the information I needed, I brought together the people who needed to know it, and together we came up with solutions to advance the mission. That’s what I’m going to do for you. And I will make being Councilman my full-time job, working to improve our lives in this District and our City every day.

 

 

Ryan Dorsey, Candidate for City Council- 3rd District

In an effort to educate voters, we will be posting responses to our candidate questionnaire. Questionnaires were emailed to each candidate running for City Council, President of City Council, and Mayor. Candidates have until March 4th to submit. We are publishing results in the order they are received. 

How frequently do you us=e a mode of transportation other than your car to navigate the city? Based on your experience, where should the city prioritize resources for transportation?

RD: I ride my bike more frequently than most, but not nearly as much as I would like. I am admittedly a fair weather rider, but I prefer my bike to my car. I can get to work faster on my bike. I take my bike to social engagements in all parts of the city, and during this campaign I have even biked to canvass in areas of the 3rd District. Our priorities should be placed in anything that moves us away from the dominance of private automobiles, makes us a safer and healthier city, and builds transit equity for people who actually live in Baltimore City. Every person in Baltimore City and the region should be acutely aware and appalled that two thirds of our city’s daily workforce is non-city residents and that two thirds of our daily workforce is driving to their job in a car without a second person in it. We need to vigorously pursue every measure that puts the most basic modes of movement first - walking and biking. This means overall reduction of the amount of land we cede to cars, and the expansion of all manner of accommodations for cyclists, pedestrians and mass transit users working together with advocates of interests that cross over with transportation - health, environment, inclusionary and affordable housing, public safety...

My top three priorities: protected bike facilities, bus shelters, and crosswalks. Every person who would even consider cycling should be able to ride anywhere in the city with the utmost confidence in their safety. Bus riders should be able to wait and transfer out of the elements, and preferably in really beautiful spaces that make any neighborhood more attractive. Pedestrians, especially students walking to school, should be able to cross any road in safety with little hesitation. All of these, plus the removal of parking requirements from zoning and building approvals, are part of a vision for a more livable, less car-centric city.

What role do you believe biking and walking improvements can play in creating a safer, healthier, more livable Baltimore?

RD: Objectively these are more healthy ways of moving than driving, both for the individual and those sharing our environment. And objectively fewer people driving cars amounts to less of the inherent safety risks that cars pose. But there’s more to this still. Prioritizing cycling and pedestrian safety, particularly along mixed use but primarily commercial roads like Harford Road, flanked by entirely residential neighborhoods, amounts to improving all aspects of life, an across-the-board positive, big-bang-for-your-buck investment. And I use this particular one as an example in my campaign every day. I argue that it could be developed into a model for other similar corridors leading from the county into downtown.

Reduce the road from four lanes to two by creating parking-protected cycle tracks on both sides of the street, creating angle parking on one side to also increase parking space. This effectively creates pedestrian safety on both sidewalks and shortening street crossing distance. These things improve retail business support. Well supported retail districts become more attractive for new businesses who would fill vacancies. Safer, more compelling commercial areas help attract and retain families and residents who would walk from nearby homes. More people walking side street to patronize these businesses means more eyes to help stave off crimes of opportunity (a common concern in neighborhoods where the most frequently reported crime is larceny from auto) without increased police patrolling. This all amounts also to job creation and accessibility, and would-be cyclists and walkers being able to better hold jobs because feet and pedals are way more reliable than MTA.

Often road redesigns that improve the safety for people on bikes or people walking do so in a way that removes priority for single occupant vehicles. This can look like removing lanes for travel or decreasing available street parking. Can you describe how you would manage public expectations during project implementation, and handle any backlash from constituents that don’t share in the City’s vision for complete streets?

RD: First of all, persistent and regular communication with residents is vital to ensuring that any project implementation is successful. No matter what project the city is planning to pursue, be it the addition of a cycle track or the repair of a major bridge, it needs to communicate with residents about the schedule of the project, its impact on the neighborhood and the benefits residents will see as a result. It also needs to listen to residents’ concerns and input up front. One major issue we’ve had with the implementation of cycling infrastructure is that it is not swiftly, or even fully implemented. In the 3rd District, it took months for the city to install flex posts on the Walther Blvd. bike lane. In addition, signage for the lane was never installed and very little enforcement by the police occurred. As a result, motorists continue to use this lane as a second travel lane, endangering cyclists and other motorists. The city sends mixed messages to both cyclists and motorists when it does not fully finish the bike infrastructure projects it starts. Motorists see poorly implemented bike lanes as a nuisance, while cyclists see them as a hazard or a symbol that the city does not really care about their safety. On the other hand, well-managed and installed bike infrastructure will quickly show the public how important these projects are to the health of our city. The more projects we can build successfully following a fully engaged public input process, the more buy-in we will get from cyclists, neighbors and motorists.

Recent audits have discovered that the Department of Transportation struggles to measure key performance indicators. The city’s procurement and project management processes have also faced scrutiny. This has led to significant delays of key improvements to bicycle infrastructure in Baltimore. How will you work to improve performance and accountability of city agencies like the Department of Transportation under your leadership?

RD: I will use public hearings to hold mayoral appointees and city management accountable on an ongoing basis. I will scrutinize every budget and any nominee for appointment, seeking better contract writing and management. I will propose and support a charter amendment to restructure the Board of Estimates in such a way as to give the council greater oversight of those involved in writing and awarding contracts. I will engage the Office of the Inspector General to investigate matters of waste, fraud and abuse. I will propose a charter amendment requiring more rigorous and frequent audit requirements and actionable repercussions for failure to perform them.

The percentage of people choosing to take public transit or ride a bike for transportation is increasing in Baltimore, while the percentage of residents without access to a vehicle is over 30%. How would you rate the city’s current investment in sustainable transportation solutions for its residents, and as a council person what would you do to support increased investment?

RD: I rate it pretty low. The biggest investment made in sustainable transportation seems to be the Circulator, but that could hardly be seen as an investment FOR RESIDENTS, considering its basic impetus is to get DRIVERS from garages to jobs, drivers who are coming from counties, nonetheless. Also, by the very fact that it doesn’t serve any predominantly black neighborhoods in a majority black city, I’m pretty sure that can’t be mistaken as being for residents either.

A recent study by Harvard economists found that the single strongest factor affecting the odds of a child escaping poverty is not the test scores of his or her local schools or the crime in the community; it is the percent of workers in his or her neighborhood who have long commutes. How do you plan to improve transportation options and commute times for our most vulnerable residents?

RD: Prioritizing cycling infrastructure over driving lanes has actually shown to decrease congestion, which should amount to better bus reliability where bike and bus routes overlap - while biking also gives many people another safe option for getting to work faster than driving, and without having to wait for a bus or transfer. On a similar topic, 40% of students are missing more than a month of school each year. This can be largely attributed to transportation options/problems. We must do better here. I have proposed city sponsored rideshare. A student living in Park Heights and attending Digital Harbor High School, if everything is running on time, faces 3 to 3-½ hours in transit daily, diminishing many other opportunities for engagement, experience, and growth. Meanwhile, there’s almost certainly somebody driving from a nearby neighborhood to Locust Point and back at the exact same times, and that person’s car probably has four empty seats in it. Technology could make it all too easy for these people to link up to one another, and I have just enough faith in humanity to believe there’s a decent chance that driver would be willing to give that kid a ride.

What other information about your candidacy would you like to share with our members?

RD: At the beginning of 2015 I began working to change the city’s plans for the Harford Road bridge at Herring Run Park. The plans for this 3 year, $30M project did not include protection of the cycle lanes, despite the volume and observed speeds of traffic (22k cars daily, 45+ mph). With assistance from Bikemore on details in the original petition and design specifications, and after 10 months of persistence through every possible angle, the plans (which DOT said would not be changed) are being changed to incorporate every aspect of the proposal.

 

 

 

 

Bill Henry, Candidate for City Council- 4th District

In an effort to educate voters, we will be posting responses to our candidate questionnaire. Questionnaires were emailed to each candidate running for City Council, President of City Council, and Mayor. Candidates have until March 4th to submit. We are publishing results in the order they are received.

How frequently do you use a mode of transportation other than your car to navigate the city? Based on your experience, where should the city prioritize resources for transportation?

BH: Not nearly as frequently as I used to, or would like. I would like to see a Citywide network of Circulator routes, but in the interim I’m investigating the possibility of using “jitneys” or “neighborhood shuttles” as a precursor; my hope is that the City would provide at least some of the operating funding for these shuttles. On a capital basis, I’m supportive of making more funds available to restripe roads for bike lanes once they’re identified as being part of a City-approved route for bicycle traffic, and requiring DOT planners to add protected bike lanes when resurfacing such roads.

What role do you believe biking and walking improvements can play in creating a safer, healthier, more livable Baltimore?

BH: By their very existence, bicycling and walking improvements would increase the number of people who bicycle and walk; if we build it, we will use it. More people biking and walking creates safer communities by getting more people out onto their streets in a more directly interactive fashion than driving, or even mass transit promotes. More bikers and walkers create healthier and more livable communities because more active people are healthier.

Often road redesigns that improve the safety for people on bikes or people walking do so in a way that removes priority for single occupant vehicles. This can look like removing lanes for travel or decreasing available street parking. Can you describe how you would manage public expectations during project implementation, and handle any backlash from constituents that don’t share in the City’s vision for complete streets?

BH: The key to managing expectations in this case is to be up front with your goals. If you tell people from the beginning of the project that the goal is to resurface the road and improve the street lighting and you spend your first six to nine months of community conversation focusing on those issues, and THEN, when the first renderings are done, someone has to ask "What are those?" when pointing at the bike lanes or refuge islands...you're in trouble. You have to make it clear from the beginning that while resurfacing the street is a goal and upgrading the lighting is a goal, providing additional safety for people on bikes or people walking is also a priority.

Recent audits have discovered that the Department of Transportation struggles to measure key performance indicators. The city’s procurement and project management processes have also faced scrutiny. This has led to significant delays of key improvements to bicycle infrastructure in Baltimore. How will you work to improve performance and accountability of city agencies like the Department of Transportation under your leadership?

BH: The City Council is an oversight body; we can shine light on the actions - or inactions - of City agencies, and provide a forum for public discourse or criticism, but at the end of the day, most of our oversight relies on the public at-large to get engaged on an issue and demand change from the one person to whom City agencies actually report. The way our City government is set up, if you don't have the Mayor on board with your program, you need to get a new Mayor.

The percentage of people choosing to take public transit or ride a bike for transportation is increasing in Baltimore, while the percentage of residents without access to a vehicle is over 30%. How would you rate the city’s current investment in sustainable transportation solutions for its residents, and as a council person what would you do to support increased investment?

BH: Not only do I support using general funds to improve mass transit, I have already done so; the expansion of existing Circulator routes to serve more neighborhoods and businesses outside the downtown core is largely being paid for out of general funds approved by the City Council. I believe we could do more though, and I would support doing so.

A recent study by Harvard economists found that the single strongest factor affecting the odds of a child escaping poverty is not the test scores of his or her local schools or the crime in the community; it is the percent of workers in his or her neighborhood who have long commutes. How do you plan to improve transportation options and commute times for our most vulnerable residents?

BH: A better-run, better-designed mass transit system would provide shorter commute times, but so would increasing the number of living wage jobs available here inside the City.

What other information about your candidacy would you like to share with our members?

BH: Before being elected to represent the 4th District, I worked in community development; I was part of a group that took vacant and blighted houses in SE Baltimore and renovated them into homes and small businesses. Prior to that, I was staff in City Hall, first interning in the Mayor’s office while I was an undergraduate at Johns Hopkins and then full time in the City Council President’s office, where I worked my way up from legislative aide to chief of staff. I've been active as a volunteer for over twenty years, which I consider to be a big part of my education in terms of preparing me for service on the Council. I am a former board president at both Citizens Planning and Housing Association and the Strong City Baltimore (back when it was Greater Homewood) and have served on the board of the Radnor-Winston Improvement Association and on the leadership committee for the York Road Partnership. Throughout my career and my civic engagement, my goal has always been to figure out how Baltimore could be better and then help make it happen; I have spent most of my adult life working with individuals and organizations similarly committed to that goal. Whether that effort was focused on individual neighborhoods, commercial corridors, or the City as a whole, all of the experience from those endeavors - along my work on the Council to date - help make me the best candidate to keep representing the 4th District in the Baltimore City Council.

 

David Harding, Candidate for City Council-14th District

In an effort to educate voters, we will be posting responses to our candidate questionnaire. Questionnaires were emailed to each candidate running for City Council, President of City Council, and Mayor. Candidates have until March 4th to submit. We are publishing results in the order they are received.

How frequently do you use a mode of transportation other than your car to navigate the city? Based on your experience, where should the city prioritize resources for transportation?

DH: Baltimore has a poor “public transportation system.” It is partly publicly funded to bring workers to the workplaces. Companies like Amazon, Legg Mason, and Under Armour are enormously rich -- they have private jets and limos for their top executives. They could operate a free private bus service for the workers, just like Johns Hopkins does for the college students. But instead, workers have to get up at 4 a.m. because they need three MTA bus transfers. A public transportation system that exists for workers wouldn’t reduce the service on weekends. The city thinks we have nothing better to do than stand at a freezing bus stop all day long on our day off. I’m for a massive investment in public transportation – so that it becomes a real choice for most people. Today it’s not a choice. People are forced onto the bus because driving is so expensive.

I’m a Maryland state worker so I get free MTA bus and light rail travel as a benefit. At the state there’s a “second tier” of workers – thousands of them -- who are contractual so they don’t get those benefits. Maybe more people would ride public transportation if prices were reduced or if more bosses subsidized transportation passes.

What role do you believe biking and walking improvements can play in creating a safer, healthier, more livable Baltimore?

DH: For me, “healthier and more livable” means people have more leisure time. Then you can try all sorts of interesting things – visit a museum, see a play, pick up a new hobby, including bike riding. But for working people, it’s the opposite – a crisis situation. Rents and food prices keep rising while wages are stagnant. It all means workers are working harder, a number even work two jobs. So there’s more and more exhaustion at the end of a workday. That doesn’t mean I’m opposed to bike lanes. But I’m opposed to the idea that slapping down a bike lane is somehow going to improve people’s lives when their entire standard of living is under attack.

Often road redesigns that improve the safety for people on bikes or people walking do so in a way that removes priority for single occupant vehicles. This can look like removing lanes for travel or decreasing available street parking. Can you describe how you would manage public expectations during project implementation, and handle any backlash from constituents that don’t share in the City’s vision for complete streets?

DH: It’s no surprise that the city had to remove the bike lane along Monroe Street a few years ago. You can call it “backlash” or whatever you like – I think we need more of it. People are right to be angry when they wake up one morning and there’s a lane of traffic removed. It’s part of the war on working people, on poor people in the city – a push to get them out so that gentrification will continue. Look at what’s happened to Fells Point, Canton, Camden Yards. In the neighborhoods, bike lanes end up as a problem especially at rush hour, because the streets aren’t wide enough. If there’s a shortage of funds for transportation needs, it’s because the city hands over millions of dollars to developers -- construction bonds, tax subsidies to billionaires – it’s the same policy that led to the bankruptcies of Jefferson County, Detroit, Stockton, and other cities. Instead, those millions that go to developers could be used to hire people right now. Fix the infrastructure right now – start with the pot-holes, the sewage overflows, the schools without air conditioning, the recreation centers that are closed, the houses and bridges and tunnels that are falling apart. If the city didn’t give so much to developers, it would have the money to hire by the tens of thousands to do that work. That’s how the city could be an “engine for jobs.”

Recent audits have discovered that the Department of Transportation struggles to measure key performance indicators. The city’s procurement and project management processes have also faced scrutiny. This has led to significant delays of key improvements to bicycle infrastructure in Baltimore. How will you work to improve performance and accountability of city agencies like the Department of Transportation under your leadership?

DH: I support the agency audits and I think they should be annual, and the results made public and transparent. And I think they should be extended to include the whole city – including the Baltimore development corporation, where a lot of the money is “set aside,” but the facts and figures to support these deals are not easy to understand. I think DOT is typical of many city agencies in that it comes down to staffing. The city has lost more than 3,000 regular full-time positions between the 1990’s and now. Paperwork, budgeting, filing – it all requires more administrative workers alongside the drivers and mechanics. But the city has obviously viewed those workers as expendable. The audit exposed the problem, but it can’t solve the problem. I would also point out that it’s always the ordinary worker who is asked to be “accountable” even though the problems come from management. “Accountability” has become a code word for attacking government employees – and also teachers. So the next question is what do people want to do about it.

The percentage of people choosing to take public transit or ride a bike for transportation is increasing in Baltimore, while the percentage of residents without access to a vehicle is over 30%. How would you rate the city’s current investment in sustainable transportation solutions for its residents, and as a council person what would you do to support increased investment?

DH: The Red Line was about gentrification and re-development. It had nothing to do with transportation or with “helping” the neighborhoods of West Baltimore – or East Baltimore for that matter. Because if we wanted to “help” we could be improving the bus lines right now! As of last week there were still bus stops with snow piles from the blizzard of a month ago – because there weren’t people available to do that work. At the same time, Hogan’s bus proposal represents an attack on workers and the poor. Anytime there is a massive reshuffling, it’s a way to hide cutbacks. Hogan pretends that he wants to shorten the wait times -- and he’s going to do that by shortening the routes. But just look at the proposed cuts to the #8 bus. Anyone who claims its “only” so many extra blocks has never used the bus -- hasn’t organized their daily lives around when the bus is coming.

A recent study by Harvard economists found that the single strongest factor affecting the odds of a child escaping poverty is not the test scores of his or her local schools or the crime in the community; it is the percent of workers in his or her neighborhood who have long commutes. How do you plan to improve transportation options and commute times for our most vulnerable residents?

DH: Apparently even the so-called geniuses at Harvard can confuse cause with effect. Of course working people and poor people have the least choices about where they’re going to work and where they’re going to live. So it’s no surprise they have the longest commutes. That’s part of why the #8 bus proposal is an absolute outrage. When you count the walking time in both directions it will add an additional 45 minutes to workdays that are already long and exhausting. MTA management and City Hall claim to propose “options.” They’ll pit one route against another, one neighborhood against another, Circulator versus MTA. But the Circulator could run up to Greenmount and the #8 bus could run along Greenmount too. They pretend the money isn’t there for that. It’s there, but it’s all been handed over to developers. Why does a billionaire like Paterakis need a tax break for Harbor Point? Instead we should hire, hire, hire – for buses, subway, infrastructure and schools and libraries, and every other city service.

What other information about your candidacy would you like to share with our members?

DH: I’m trying to get on the ballot as an independent because I think the working class needs its own party, separate from the Democrats and Republicans. But for those changes, it comes down not to the city council but to what working people are ready to do. If you’re interested please write my email address at Davidharding2016@gmail.com

 

John Bullock, Candidate for City Council - 9th District

John Bullock.png

In an effort to educate voters, we will be posting responses to our candidate questionnaire. Questionnaires were emailed to each candidate running for City Council, President of City Council, and Mayor. Candidates have until March 4th to submit. We are publishing results in the order they are received.

How frequently do you use a mode of transportation other than your car to navigate the city? Based on your experience, where should the city prioritize resources for transportation?

JB: Approximately 25% of the time I walk and 10% of the time I use transit. My priorities would be complementing the existing transit system with light rail and/or street cars. This would eliminate gaps in coverage and build connections to current routes. Given that funds are scarce, the targets must be limited to ensure maximum effectiveness. There should also be a focus on upgrading a system that has been woefully neglected, including bus shelters and fleet maintenance.

What role do you believe biking and walking improvements can play in creating a safer, healthier, more livable Baltimore?

JB: City streets are not just for automobiles, but must accommodate walking and bicycling. These self-ambulatory forms of transportation are environmentally friendly and should be encouraged. Traffic calming devices would improve pedestrian safety and a city-wide bike lane network would make bicycling safer and more accessible. Public education campaigns could also be useful in spreading awareness.

Often road redesigns that improve the safety for people on bikes or people walking do so in a way that removes priority for single occupant vehicles. This can look like removing lanes for travel or decreasing available street parking. Can you describe how you would manage public expectations during project implementation, and handle any backlash from constituents that don’t share in the City’s vision for complete streets?

JB: I am committed to having an open door policy and willing to help explain the rationale behind changes that impact the community. Additionally, there should be more communication between the City and affected neighborhoods to address such concerns. It must be an inclusionary process to provide valuable input and receive feedback prior to implementation.

Recent audits have discovered that the Department of Transportation struggles to measure key performance indicators. The city’s procurement and project management processes have also faced scrutiny. This has led to significant delays of key improvements to bicycle infrastructure in Baltimore. How will you work to improve performance and accountability of city agencies like the Department of Transportation under your leadership?

JB: One of the roles of the City Council is to provide oversight and investigative functions, and I am committed to exercising this duty more consistently. We must continue to demand accountability from city agencies through regular audits and reviews. Additionally, progress reports regarding the status of such improvements would provide more transparency.

The percentage of people choosing to take public transit or ride a bike for transportation is increasing in Baltimore, while the percentage of residents without access to a vehicle is over 30%. How would you rate the city’s current investment in sustainable transportation solutions for its residents, and as a council person what would you do to support increased investment?

JB: The current level of investment in transportation is lacking. A comprehensive, multi-modal system that emphasizes transit oriented development is imperative. As one who served on the Station Area Advisory Committee for the West Baltimore MARC Station, I recognize the potential for economic development that was lost with the rejection of the Red Line. However, we must continue to work with city and state stakeholders to link people with opportunity in our city.

A recent study by Harvard economists found that the single strongest factor affecting the odds of a child escaping poverty is not the test scores of his or her local schools or the crime in the community; it is the percent of workers in his or her neighborhood who have long commutes. How do you plan to improve transportation options and commute times for our most vulnerable residents?

JB: Baltimore City is contending with a spatial mismatch – the jobs are not where the potential workers live. A regional approach requires coordinated policy and planning decisions that make it possible for efficient commuting. This will require cooperation and resource investment; the payoff will be increased productivity in the workforce through cutting travel times.

What other information about your candidacy would you like to share with our members?

JB: As a former transportation planner, I understand the role of different transportation modes and am committed to working toward sustainable solutions.