Proposed Sharp Street Bikeway Violates BCDOT's Own Guidance

Take action today by sending an email about this unacceptable design. Scroll down to read the full details.

Separated bike lane extension under the Convention Center

On June 8th, Baltimore City Department of Transportation presented plans for the Sharp Street Bikeway Rapid Enhancement Plan. Construction is funded through a Maryland Bikeways grant awarded in FY2022.

The project makes a connection from the end of the Maryland/Cathedral cycletrack through the Convention Center to Conway Street with a separated bike lane. This is a major improvement over current conditions, and should be celebrated.

After that, it becomes sharrows—just painted bike symbols—in the road.

Baltimore City Bicycle Facility Selection Criteria Table

Baltimore City has not followed its own codified guidance on the corridor, which can be seen on page 54 of the Baltimore Complete Streets Manual.

Proposed “sharrows” as the only treatment on Sharp Street south of Conway

The proposed design is sharrows with a yellow centerline. Baltimore City Complete Streets guidance only permits bicycle boulevards on two-way streets without a centerline, and treatments required for bicycle boulevard designs like speed cushions are not proposed for this project.

At minimum, traffic calming curb extensions and speed cushions must be installed along with bicycle wayfinding sharrows for this design to comply with city ordinance. Speed cushions can be designed to allow bike, truck, and emergency vehicle traffic to navigate normally while slowing down personal automobiles, as the latter have a narrower track width.

A fire engine demonstrating speed cushion spacing that allows trucks and bikes to avoid the cushions while slowing cars, as they have a narrower width tire-to-tire.

The best and safest option would be replacing parking on the west side of Sharp Street with a separated, two-way bike lane and concrete curb stops.

A separated bikeway would be the safest option for people of all ages and abilities.

Contrary to statements made at the meeting, parking utilization is low on this side of the street, as it fronts the Federal Reserve impacting no residences directly.

This design would realize the adopted Baltimore Green Network Plan goals for the corridor, which calls for it to be a "Community Corridor" with elements such as "bump-outs and traffic calming, improved sidewalks, protected bikeways or multi-user paths, and improved and new trail connections," by directly connecting the Maryland/Cathedral cycletrack to the East Coast Greenway, Baltimore Greenway Trails Network, and Reimagine Middle Branch at Solo Gibbs Park.

"Security Concerns" about having a separated bike lane along a Federal Reserve Branch are preposterous when that same space is currently occupied by car parking. Bikemore surveyed all Federal Reserve headquarters and branches, as well as US Mints, and found that a majority have dedicated bike infrastructure directly adjacent to their properties.

We encourage Baltimore City Department of Transportation to follow its own adopted guidance in designing bicycle infrastructure for all-ages and abilities, and rectify this substandard plan.

Big Jump Extension: Support Alternative #1 with Parklets

The Greater Remington Improvement Association, with a letter of support from Baltimore City Department of Transportation, was awarded a $50,000 Baltimore Regional Neighborhood Initiative grant from the Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development in 2022 to create a road diet on 28th Street, expanding The Big Jump to directly connect to the Maryland Avenue cycletrack.

The grant was specifically written for a design like the one shown in the streetmix above, and included provisions to maintain existing community parklets like the one at 28th and Huntingdon, serving Mount Royal Soaps and Café Los Sueños. The grant timeline included an install schedule of March 2022.

Last night, the 1st of March 2023, Baltimore City Department of Transportation held their first public meeting on the project. While they included the above design as one alternative, they also provided a second alternative that would not comply with the awarded community grant. And, in the first alternative, they claimed it was necessary to remove the community parklet to increase level of service for cars. This would also not comply with the awarded community grant, and is completely inconsistent with Complete Streets.

You can see more information on the BCDOT project page here. Public comment is open until March 20, 2023.

Bikemore endorses Alternative #1, with retention of the existing community parklet and no turn lanes. Send an email to BCDOT:

Our Comments on the FY2024-2029 Capital Budget

Today Bikemore provided testimony to the Baltimore City Planning Commission on the FY2024-2029 Baltimore City Department of Transportation Capital Budget. You can check out the budget yourself by clicking here. Our formal remarks are pasted in their entirety below, and we will update this post with answers to additional questions we sent in as they are answered.

Chairman Davis and members of the Planning Commission:

Over the years Bikemore has testified in CIP hearings critiquing Baltimore City Department of Transportation’s spending priorities and ability to execute, while also advocating that despite this, they need more money

Last year Bikemore worked with fellow transportation advocates, MACo, Baltimore City, and peer jurisdictions to advocate for increased Highway User Revenue shares for the city. One critique we heard in Annapolis was a fear that Baltimore City would ultimately redirect increased funds away from transportation. Despite this critique, we were successful, and DOT is supposed to be armed with significantly increased funds to spend on the massive backlog of deferred needs presented by Interim Director Johnson today.

Yet Finance is not issuing bonds this year for Baltimore City Department of Transportation, and are allocating Highway User Revenues for non-transportation purposes, ultimately resulting in a budget decrease over prior year. We urge the Planning Commission to condemn this approach. We can't stress this enough: this is money for transportation and the city is poised to completely embarrass itself in Annapolis by doing exactly what critics claimed it would do with these increased funds in diverting them elsewhere.

Looking at this year’s CIP, as in years past, we are concerned that legacy streetscaping and bridge division projects may be overbuilt and require subsequent extensive safety retrofit once constructed. The opportunity is now to fix those things before these projects go in, or even consider canceling projects that we can't fix and directing those funds to better projects. Retrofits of Harford Road and Central Avenue were expensive, and had our stated concerns been incorporated during 15, 30, 60, or 90% design, these concerns could have been addressed more affordably.

We are also concerned that the Baltimore City Department of Transportation continues to bear the burden of all ADA retrofits in the city, which is in part a product of their own unfortunate street cuts policies and franchise agreements. 

But largely, we are impressed with this CIP. It continues a trend of shifting investments toward ADA, Transit, and other critical complete streets safety retrofits. It preps us for large scale, transformative infrastructure changes on some of our most dangerous corridors that are barriers between disinvested neighborhoods and parks, jobs, and opportunity, with the existing Reconnecting Communities Grant Application and planning projects in the CIP for a subsequent application for Druid Park Lake Drive. We encourage the commission to prioritize these complete streets projects in ranking, specifically those advancing transit.

This brings us to the matter of execution. This year's departures of the BCDOT Director Steve Sharkey, Chief of Staff Adrea Turner, Data Analyst Brian Seel, Capital Planning Chief Lysh Lorber, Complete Streets Manager Graham Young, Lead Bike Planner Matt Hendrickson, and Interim Transit Bureau Chief and Shared Mobility Coordinator Meg Young are deeply concerning, and many of these departures are related to the lack of political will to execute projects. The short summary is, we're at a tipping point. There's a lot of good here. But will it be executed? 

We’ll give an example. The Eutaw Place separated bike lane is in this year's CIP. Funds have been banked for this project in the CIP for years. It was in the 2017 Separated Bike Lane Network Plan adopted by this commission, at the time slated for priority install within two years. Today, four years after it was supposed to be installed, we're finally at the finish line with a funded project for installation as soon as the weather warms.

Yet this week we've learned it's on indefinite hold–despite broad community support–over concerns from a vocal minority about mild parking loss, something that can't even legally be prioritized under our Complete Streets Ordinance. This decision may force us to return Maryland Bikeways grant funding, and affect millions of dollars in potential future awards. 

We fear transit projects that will require significant parking sacrifices to be truly transformative, like our North-South and East-West RTP corridors, could suffer a similar fate, negatively impacting hundreds of thousands of transit riders. 

This example shows we have a choice to tip forward, but it looks like we may tip backward. Even if we fix the money problem, we need real leadership and adherence to our laws to see these projects cross the finish line. 

Thanks for the opportunity to comment.

Sincerely,

Jed Weeks
Interim Executive Director